Ethics
Funny how the debate
over Bob Greene’s affair with a teenager fizzled out.
Everybody agreed the
former Chicago Tribune columnist shouldn’t have done it, but few
explored the broader issues of reporter/source relationships.
Yet does everyone know where the line is drawn? In fact, is there
a line? Why shouldn’t a reporter date a source?
The Chicago Tribune
— Bob Greene’s newspaper for many years — noted in an editorial
on his departure that “readers, news sources and the subjects
of articles have a right to trust a newspaper, quite apart from
whether they like what it prints.”
But the other side
of that coin, of course, is that readers have a right NOT to trust
a paper. And the newsroom has the right to be stupid, and has
the responsibility of earning — earning — the readers’ trust.
Trust is not a given: No journalist or other media body should
expect the readers to trust them. Indeed, it should always come
as a pleasant surprise when the readers do invest that trust in
the newspaper, newscast, or other media package.
What does this mean
to Joan Reporter? Doesn’t she have a right to a private life?
As a working
reporter –from London to Halifax, Montreal, Whitehorse and Vancouver—
it took me a long time to accept the idea that I didn’t have a
private life, that I was never off-duty.
Writing about the Bob
Greene incident, Bob Steele, who leads ethics debates at the U.S.-based
Poynter Institute, remarked: “Like it or not, we are always journalists,
even when we are technically off-the-clock.We are much like other
professionals — physicians, law enforcement officers, educators,military
personnel and others — who carry a unique and profound responsibility
to those we serve.” (http://www.
poynter.org/talkaboutethics/091902.htm)
Always journalists.Never
off-duty.That’s setting the bar very high. But if we want to be
free to criticize a cabinet minister for having sex with a 17-year-old,
then we’d better not do it ourselves. And yet the average citizen
feels free to commit adultery or to get falling-down drunk or
to exceed the speed limit without being held to account by the
news media. So why should journalists live to a higher standard?
If Bob Greene was
a traffic warden instead of a columnist, his affair with a teenager
would have been ignored. Greene apparently went well beyond just
dating a source. He bedded a student who interviewed him for a
school project. Even though it only came to light many years later,
Greene seems to have transgressed some line involving the youth
of the girl (though technically of the age of consent) and the
fact that she initiated the contact.
Would it have been
different if she were in college? In journalism school? Would
it have been different if he was a she and she was a he? The “what
ifs”are endless. (What if he simply met her as a reporter interviewing
a woman on the street?) But, as the self-appointed burrs under
society’s saddle, we need to remember why we do what we do: To
comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, we’d better
not get too comfortable ourselves. And it may seem very uncomfortable
indeed to be always on duty, always professional, always role
models.
Perhaps that’s the
price we pay for having so much fun.