TOOLS OF THE TRADE
BY SALEEM KHAN
Computer in a pocket
Technology makes it easy for journalists on the fly to store information
electronically
This column began with a question. I don’t remember what
it was, but it was one of many from journalists asking for information
or advice about various forms of technology or its effect on their
jobs and the manner in which they worked.
Over the last few years I’ve attempted to answer some of
these questions (with varying degrees of success) but one I don’t
think I’ve answered enough is what tools can help us in
our daily work? I hope this installment of Tools of the Trade
is a first step toward correcting that oversight.
We take the pen for granted. It’s the basic tool of our
trade.It’s a symbol of our work.And it’s relatively
unchanged since the introduction of the ballpoint. Pen manufacturer
A. T. Cross has been trying to change that and has been winning
industry and design awards not only for aesthetics, but for its
ground-up reconstruction of that familiar implement.
One of its award-winners, the wide-barreled Cross Matrix, is most
easily described as a Swiss Army knife of pens.Its anodized aluminum
cylinder houses a pair of ballpoint pens (red, blue or black ink),
a stylus for a personal digital assistant (PDA) device such as
a Palm or PocketPC,and mated to the obverse end of the stylus
module, a rollerball or fountain pen, depending on which version
you choose. Both versions include a second stylus/highlighter
module.And it’s light.
Following a bout of crippling carpal tunnel syndrome a few years
ago, I had to relearn how to write.That ordeal also taught me
to appreciate the value of a good pen. I was prepared to be underwhelmed
by the Matrix but even with my personal bias against rollerballs,
I found it was welldesigned, both technically and functionally,
and it was easy to switch ink-colour on the fly when I wanted
an important interview point to stand out in my notebook. I still
haven’t decided whether this is the ideal reporter’s
pen (owing mainly to my anti-rollerball bias) but I can say I’m
pleasantly surprised by it.
Another item that’s been an object of my skepticism for
years has been the PDA. I never saw any reason to switch from
my paper day planner to an electronic version. Still, I’d
been considering getting one for some time,if only for the perceived
convenience of having several of the items I carry in my reporting
kit in one small package. But I resisted the switch since the
feature I expected to use
the most was the day planner. Here’s why: For the first
while after I get a new planner I update it diligently. But it’s
not always convenient to carry around, so I get a pocket schedule
book... which I then have to reconcile with the one on my desk.
Inevitably, that time-saving convenience-builder suddenly becomes
a time-consuming pit that hinders rather than facilitates productivity.
I’ve been surprised to learn that there are a lot of others
who feel the same way. I still get an agenda book every year but
experience has informed me to rely more on my memory than on that
book and it’s become second nature... which brings us back
to
why I was skeptical about what PDA could do for me.
What I found when I began using a Palm m130 — a plastic-shelled
device with a colour screen, 8 megabytes of memory and a memory
card expansion slot — was that it was much more convenient
to update,move appointments and store
memos, contact and to-do lists.The automatic task prioritizing
function made it much easier for me to keep track of incomplete
items and interview subjects who were slow to return my calls.
And its physical design — styled differently from previous
models — made it easy to carry in my jeans or throw into
my reporting kit without fear of scratching, scraping or otherwise
damaging it.
PDAs aren’t great for taking interview notes (they’re
a tad slow for that) but you can write articles on one using an
add-on keyboard,which I do.In fact, the Palm saved several articles
I was working on — including this one — after my computer
suffered a major crash, I discovered the data in my backup files
had been corrupted and the only intact versions I had were on
the Palm.
The keyboard I used most to write stories on the Palm was made
of fabric — the Logitech KeyCase, a durable,wrap-around
case that protects the PDA itself and uses circuit-imprinted fabric
from German manufacturer ElekSen to make a functional takeanywhere
keyboard.What I liked most about it was the ability to use it
on irregular or curved surfaces, something that rigid folding
keyboards
have a problem with since they move with each key press on anything
but a
flat surface. The KeyCase’s versatility and fact that you
don’t have to worry about it breaking if you drop it suffer
rough handling inside your luggage, makes it ideal for travel.But
I regard it as more of a convenient utility than a deadline-driven
reporter’s tool.While the technology employed by ElekSen
works well, the keyboard is just shy of being fast enough to keep
up with a fast typist.
Another keyboard, the PockeTop by the Vancouver company of the
same name, takes a different approach to its redesign of the PDA
keyboard — it’s wireless.It uses a PDA’s infrared
port as a bridge between the keyboard and the PDA,
making it possible to set your PDA some distance from the keyboard
— convenient if you don’t have enough space to rest
your keyboard somewhere. Its
clamshell design and sculpted keys make it easy to carry and use,
and despite its compact size, the PockeTop feels the most like
a solid,standard desktop
keyboard than any I have used.
As I mentioned earlier,I was afflicted by the topranked occupational
health hazard for journalists — repetitive strain injury
— a few years ago,which made it impossible to type or write.
I tried to write using several voice recognition software programs
at the time but found them exceedingly frustrating and inaccurate,
even after “training” them to recognize what I was
saying. The new version of IBM’s ViaVoice is a vast improvement.
I skipped the training mode and was pleasantly surprised to find
that even without training the program, it was surprisingly accurate
and almost as fast as typing manually.I used it to write this
paragraph with little effort.
The space available doesn’t allow me to go into detail
about any one of the items I’ve mentioned above,and there
are others that I just couldn’t include. For a more detailed
look at all of them,visit the Web page listed below.
Saleem Khan is a Toronto-based journalist and CAJ board
member. You can find Internet links and more information on the
subjects mentioned in this column at www.saleemkhan.com/tools.